![]() |
|
|||||||
| Article Library Find articles that have appeared in wires, trade publications, web sites. PLEASE NOTE: Do not reply to these posts, choose the appropriate forum for the subject and create a discussion thread there. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spine. 2008 Jul 1;33(15):1701-7.
Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS. Department of Orthopaedics and Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. James.harrop@jefferson.edu STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of published incidence of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after arthrodesis or total disc replacement. OBJECTIVE: Assess impact of surgery method and other factors on the incidence of ASDeg and ASDis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Twenty-seven articles, none of which were class I or II, met the inclusion criteria. Twenty involved arthrodesis (1732 patients) and 7 involved arthroplasty (758 patients). Nineteen detailed ASDeg and 16 detailed ASDis. METHODS: Data were established for number of patients, gender, average patient age, incidence of ASDeg and ASDis, average time to follow-up, and level and type of surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify which parameters had a significant effect on the incidence of ASDeg and ASDis. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen of 926 patients in the arthrodesis group (34%) and 31 out of 313 patients in the total disc replacement group (9%) developed ASDeg. (P < 0.0001) Multivariate logistic regression indicated that higher odds of ASDeg were associated with: older patients (P < 0.001); arthodesis (P = 0.0008); and longer follow-up (P = 0.0025). For ASDis, 173/1216 (14%) arthrodesis patients developed ASDis compared to 7/595 (1%) of arthroplasty patients (P < 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression, higher odds of ASDis were seen in studies with fusion (P < 0.0001), higher percentages of male patients (P = 0.0019), and shorter follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the literature suggests a correlation between fusion and the development of ASDeg compared to arthroplasty, but this association is dampened by the influence of patient age. There is a stronger correlation between fusion and ASDis compared to arthroplasty. The data supports only a class C recommendation (lowest tier) for the use of arthroplasty to reduce ASDis and disc degeneration compared to arthrodesis. PMID: 18594464 [PubMed - in process] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1...?dopt=Abstract
__________________
"Harrison" info (at) adrsupport.org Founder & Moderator of ADRSupport & APF Arthroplasty Patient Foundation, a 501 (c)(3) Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004 Cell: 617-314-5900 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adjacent Segment Disease Lumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up | Slackwater | Article Library | 0 | 05-15-2008 01:30 PM |
| The impact of adjacent segment degeneration... | Harrison | Article Library | 0 | 03-29-2008 01:15 PM |
| Lumbar Fusion vs Arthroplasty: Adjacent Segment Degeneration Disease AANS/CNS 2/29/08 | Slackwater | Article Library | 0 | 02-09-2008 10:06 PM |